Those famous last words of ‘I don’t know what I am doing here’. It also happened to be the lasting and abiding quote of Hodgson’s reign.

In this final segment, I’m looking at the final piece of this mismatched jigsaw; tone. I have already established that the tactics and personnel were just plain wrong, however I contend that above all the tone in and around the England team during the European Championship finals of 2016 were the primary reason for our frankly atrocious tournament.

There is a repetitive narrative to England’s tournament experiences, it plays out like a scratched vinyl broken in a looping monotony that you try to rescue, only to step away and find it in exactly the same predicament a few seconds later. We are our own worst enemies; we struggle to overcome the psychological tests presented. The post tournament inquests normally always questions the psychological factors – mentality, desire, concentration, expectation – all of which could be best summarised as tone. The tone spawned in readiness for a tournament always jolts from one extreme to another – self-deprecation to world-beaters on the England Geiger Meter. To that end, it probably isn’t that much of a surprise to find that I think that the tone and atmosphere generated by Hodgson, the players, the media and the general public both before and during the tournament was the decisive factor behind our failure. But we’ll stick to dissecting Hodgson’s role in this for the time being. From his puzzling media appearances to his poor decision making, Hodgson only had himself to blame for yet another early exit. His demeanour was ill fitting of a young and hungry squad, his decision making awry and his lack of pragmatism was more akin to someone still getting to grips with Championship Manager. Essentially, Hodgson struck a largely negative and defensive tone throughout the tournament – it rubbed off on the players to the point where the Iceland defeat was entirely predictable.

Continue reading

Two or three changes are possibly all it would have taken; such fine margins, but it is those fine margins that decide the fate of International mangers

In part 1 I argued that Hodgson’s inability to change his tactics for Euro 2016 was one of three reasons why England failed so dismally. In this segment I am taking a look at the problems faced with personnel selection, specifically the selection of the 23 man squad, by dissecting the balance of the squad and where personnel choices could have been rethought. It could be argued that this approach is rooted in hindsight but, as a disclaimer, I’m not arguing for a personal perspective; rather I have donned my Hodgson cap (it doesn’t fit very well) and tried to figure out why certain players were chosen and where Hodgson could have made changes.

Continue reading

Hodgson’s inability to sacrifice his ideal tactical system for the right personnel was always going to lead to another Roy-al disaster

We find ourselves at this quite familiar but no less dreadful post-tournament juncture. For the fourth time out of the last five tournaments (if you include the non appearance in 2008) England have found yet another new and ingenious way of shooting themselves in the foot despite pre-tournament expectations being relatively modest. As is familiar, blame has been attached. Fingers are being pointed. Review panels set up. Groundhog day. Fans, pundits, journalists and the majority of those working within the game are all united in their vitriolic criticism of where England went wrong and what could be done better. Roy Hodgson took the blame, as any noble ship captain should do; but it still doesn’t excuse the fact that he failed dismally in three crucial areas: tactics, personnel and tone; the cornerstones of any successful tournament.

Continue reading